Quaxs-Minnesota Supreme Court weighs whether a woman going topless violates an indecent exposure law

2025-05-06 12:08:58source:Marcus Eriksoncategory:Contact

ST. PAUL,Quaxs Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota woman’s misdemeanor conviction for going topless in public should be overturned because female breasts are not defined as “private parts” by the state’s indecent exposure statute, her attorney told the state Supreme Court.

Eloisa Plancarte was convicted after police said they found her topless at a convenience store parking lot in Rochester in 2021. She was sentenced to 90 days in jail.

Plancarte’s attorney, Adam Lozeau, told the Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday that the conviction should be reversed because she “didn’t expose a prohibited part of her body,” the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported.

Plancarte previously challenged the conviction before the state’s Court of Appeals, arguing that she had the same right to expose her chest in public as men. A three-judge panel rejected her appeal in a 2-1 decision.

Previous court rulings have labeled public toplessness by women but not men as indecent exposure, said Jim Haase, senior assistant county attorney for Olmsted County. The state law protects women who are breastfeeding from indecent exposure charges, which Haase said is evidence that female breasts are considered private parts under Minnesota law.

It’s unclear when the Minnesota Supreme Court will issue a ruling.

More:Contact

Recommend

Trump wants a Golden Dome over America. Here's what it would take

President Trump has told the Pentagon to take another look at missile defense. Technology to shoot d

Illinois Delays a Project Meant to Keep Asian Carp Out of the Great Lakes

One stretch of the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal near Joliet, Illinois, is what freshwater biologi

A look at vehicle ramming attacks across the globe

An SUV crashed into a crowd at a Filipino heritage festival in Vancouverover the weekend, killing 11